We all like to talk about Mauritius being this lighthouse for Africa, this great offshore centre and while we have certainly done some good things there, I do not see how we will be able to move up to the next level, particularly in Africa unless we improve our understanding of finance. Yes we can do some back- office Net Asset Value calculations because we have a decent and relatively cheap accounting base here and, let us face it, the tax efficiency of the destination vis - à - vis India and others helps a lot too. But what about private equity, what about asset management, what about more sophisticated treasury management beyond the basics that the South Africans and British send us to replicate? When it comes to value added services, we still have a long way to go in Mauritius not because we, as some wrongly believe, do not have any human capital skills to do so (although the pool is quite limited due to the reasons discussed before) but because we have not focused in this area enough.
Let me give a simple example based on my own very relevant experience to prove a simple point. A few years ago, a few colleagues and I decided to set up an African equity fund that would be truly diversified across the region at a time when African markets were crashing down. Some of us who understood markets could see the opportunity of a lifetime once the tightening cycle of monetary policy in both Kenya and Nigeria would end and asset rotation towards equities would once again take place (even moderate rotation would be enough). It was also very clear that in less liquid markets, near monopolies or market leaders, which had limited free floats but were growing at an impressive pace (free cash flows), would see their share prices soar once investor sentiment would turn positive.
It is not easy to create a fund from scratch and thanks to the entire team and group I worked for, we were able to not only make timely investments into many markets but had some of the best performances in the African equity space. It is not often that you hear about Mauritian companies managing funds that are beating the South Africans, the British firms and the infamous Americans at their own game, but we did it, not for a few months, but for more than two and a half years. The relative performance is frankly even more impressive when one considers the resources differential between an upcoming local firm and an American one! The biggest difficulty for anyone wishing to set up a specialized Africa focused fund was and is not the fund where the right people can get the right performance or even the structure of a firm, but the genuine difficulties in fundraising when you are a small firm based in Mauritius.
In general and beyond my experience, it may be easy and theoretical to talk about the need to dilute shareholdings in Mauritius and take up international partners, but in this asset management and private equity business, nobody will talk unless you can put tens of millions of dollars on the table, something not all of us can do here. When you still lack credibility, you need to bring in more seed capital, else, it would be easier for the international partner to simply take your staff away and move them to the United Kingdom! Some have even asked me why private equity firms or such funds cannot list themselves on the market and raise the cash since the country is awash with excess liquidity.
Well, simple, say you wish to raise money for an African fund you create. Your license does matter. A specialist fund investing in Africa cannot just go and raise money in the market via a listing, it is not for everyone and you probably already need to find your institutional investors anyway, which defeats the purpose of listing. Of course launching a managed equity fund, for example, is not a closed ended fund or ETF, and it simply will not work the same way. There may be excess liquidity in the system but a lot of this is temporary (Government foreign borrowings deposited at commercial banks when coupled with a fall in the demand for credit from the indebted corporate sector) and there is an obvious mismatch between the time this excess may be here with us and the investment horizon of a fund which can be up to 5 years and even higher for private equity funds.
Lastly, Mauritians care more about capital guarantied products which rely more on exotic options that may be based on purely equity and hedge - able assets or based on systematic investment strategies (Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance strategy for example) based on a whole pool of funds. Basically, those who have been in this market know very well that listing some private equity funds or mutual funds in the local stock market beyond convenience listing will not get you much. The question of firm shareholder dilution and reluctance to do so does not pose itself at the mutual fund level.
I firmly believe that policy makers should sit with those who understand asset management and private equity and better understand their needs. Frankly development economics is no longer what we need to see from the advisors of policy makers, but more so an understanding of modern finance.
On the private equity space, I have often written about the need to turn this country into a boutique private equity hub focused not on those large heavy weight projects that the Chinese, Americans and Indians have the money and expertise to do, but on the medium sized companies that also need financing in the Eastern and Southern parts of the continent. We should focus on scope and scale with private equity placements in sectors we understand. We understand agriculture, especially sugar, we understand how to set up clinics and we understand how small and medium enterprises and commercial real estate projects that tag along with increased urbanization work and grow.
By Sameer K Sharma
Sameer Sharma is a chartered alternative investment analyst and a certified financial risk manager. This article reflects solely the personal views of the author.