African Legislatures: The Need to Be Both Transformative & Transactional

Published on 9th June 2014

East Africa Legislative Assembly in session
The discussions about African democracies generally focus on good governance, leadership, and transparency of the executive branches of governments, but hardly regularly zero key roles that legislatures (national and sub national) have to play to further advance the democratic process on the Continent today. So how can African legislative responsibilities be enhanced and improved to support good governance, improve social sectors, fight corruption, and address quality of life issues for many of the Continent’s evolving democracies?
Today’s Africa and its Legislatures.

Africa has an upward spiralling population of 1.2 billion people, which reportedly will reach 2.4 billion by 2050. Of the 54 countries on the Continent, 26 have bicameral systems, and 30 have unicameral. South Sudan is one of the newest legislatures, and Kenya is transitioning from a unicameral to bicameral legislature as part of the changes in its 2010 Constitution. For Africa to continually move forward, African legislatures must truly be transparent, and play a more significant role in how the future of their nation will be shaped, in some ways, even more so than in established democracies, or their executive branches.

There are two things they have to be: “transformational,” and “transactional,” innovators to address good governance (political/economic areas), social sector needs, and fight corruption, and then avid, committed gatekeepers of those reforms. African legislatures must have transformational, vision ideas to expand good governance, fight corruption, encourage good leadership and transparency, transform the social and economic agendas of their nations and execute or transact this into legislation or constitutional changes.

The Transformational Ledger

African Legislatures (as do others) need to keep in mind they are the voice of the people. They need to interact regularly with their constituents and focus on visions that change the political, social and economic paradigm of not only their constituents but their nation. These visions for the future should work towards fighting corruption, holding members of their members and members of their executive branches accountable, and fundamentally addressing the wealth disparities of their nations. The greatest wealth inequalities in the world are in Africa, and Asia, with South Africa and Namibia leading the way in the Africa region for this worrisome and sad statistic. In addition, internally Africa legislatures need to be more reflective of a democracy themselves as far too many are arms of the executive branch leader, whose members have no responsibility to local constituents as they are not elected in their individual capacity for job performance.

The Transactional Ledger

Legislation is a transaction, a social contract, and the manifestation of the commitment to protect and serve the people. African Legislators need to work together to draft legislation (the transactional element), to include rights-based, inclusive constitutions; economic, labor and political party reform; anti-corruption laws as part of their social contract with the people of their nation. Admittedly, here in the U.S. elements of our Congress have gotten away from this fundamental duty as part of the American dream.

Without these two synergistic roles of transformation and transaction (legislation), good governance, sustainable development, and forward movement toward long term democracy will continue to be elusive as many African nations will continue to struggle to ensure that quality of life and equitable wealth distribution become the order of the day for their people.

In far too many cases, African legislatures, and this applies to the U.S. Congress, struggle to not only draft but advance key pieces of legislation which truly change the social and economic paradigms of their nation-state. In less developed democracies, this is far more problematic because the life safety values are insufficient and sustainable institutions are rare. In Sub-Saharan Africa, this is more the case.

The 7-Point Plan to African Legislative Wellness and Sustainability

1.) Legislatures must become sustainable;

2.) Rarely is there fixed professional legislative or committee staffs who remain to provide institutional continuity for the legislative institution;

3.) Most do not have independent research or budget offices (i.e. that perform roles similar to the U.S. congressional research or budget offices) to provide them with the support needed to draft good legislation to address key social and economic issues.

4.) Most do not keep (or do not have accurate) record keeping or a library of past legislation or a repository similar to a Library of Congress.

5.) Rarely do African legislators have constituent offices in their districts; if they do they lack sufficient resources to be effective;

6.) Constituent outreach during non-elections years is rare, and in places where it is good doesn’t translate often into legislative action or long term social change for the region;

7.) Lack of donor assistance focused on educational training to address changing the culture to demonstrate the import of institutional sustainability over personal political gain.

Institutional Challenges

When legislative changes do take place in African nations, a large part of the legislative structure becomes dysfunctional for a time since most staff is linked to the life of a single politician. As  there is no professional committee or subcommittee staff that provides continuity, there is no institutional sustainability that provides best practices and some institutional memory as to what has gone on before. In many cases each time there is an electoral change, new African legislators are in reality reinventing the wheel because of this deficit in instructional sustainability. This makes their ability to meet their transformational and transactional responsibilities difficult, even if the desire is there.  Even for repeat members this lack of institutional sustainability is a problem. There are a few exceptions on the Continent.

A Closer Look

Transformational vision through transactional legislation is the only means by which African democracies can thrive and move forward. African and donor nations must refocus on these two roles for sustainable democracy as an additional development area. Countries such as Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, Ethiopia, to name a few, would not be as far behind on implementing the 2015 Millennium Development Goals if their legislatures were more transactional with the goal of transforming their nation. The last five Nigerian legislative sessions have passed very few laws (representing more than a decade). Kenya’s President may not have had his case referred to the International Criminal Court if the international community believed that the national justice system with laws legislated by the parliament were sufficient enough to independently review the case.  In Ethiopia, the legislature is a rubber stamp that is neither transformative nor independently transactional on behalf of the people. South Africa is ahead of most, with better transparency, institutionalization, but more transactional legislation is needed in the social sector reform, particularly since the country has the greatest wealth disparity in the world.

In some countries, African legislators receive enormous salaries.  Nigeria is a case in point, where anecdotal information suggests that members received $104-106,000 per quarter in salary and allowances.  African legislators have to be just as transparent as they should want their executive branches to be.  The examples on the continent of nations that fail to have truly independent legislatures with the goal of being transformative through transactional legislation are far too many to name, and rarely do Africa’s friends place enough attention and funding on assisting African legislatures at the national, and particularly at the subnational level. Yes, there is some assistance, but small, compared to need, and cannot always be targeted in the key areas mentioned above in the 7-Point Plan to African Legislative Wellness and Sustainability.

African legislators (national and subnational) could use a the 7-Point Plan checklist in order to better fulfil both their transformative and transaction roles. Donor nations, as they continue to stress good governance and leadership, should expand and be more creative in their training of African legislatures, particularly looking at areas seven areas noted above.   

By Dr. Robin R. Sanders
The author is  former U.S. Ambassador to Nigeria.


This article has been read 1,786 times
COMMENTS