Is Nigeria Ready to Lead Africa?

Published on 7th July 2014

I hail BBC for organizing a debate: Is Nigeria Ready to Lead Africa? on the 25th day of June, 2014 at Transcorp Hilton Hotel, Abuja.  I thank Mary Morgan, a producer at the BBC for inviting me to be part of the audience. At the debate, we had 3 panelists, Abba Morro, Minister of Interior, Hauwa Mustapha, Development Economist and Kalu Idika Kalu, former Finance Minister. Rivers state governor, Rotimi Amaechi and Niger state governor, Babangida Aliyu, were part of the audience, which included security experts, economists, civil society actors and young Nigerians.

The debate was enlightening, thought-provoking and interesting. The bomb blast that rocked Emba Plaza at Wuse 2 in Abuja an hour to the debate was not helpful for in-depth interrogation of the subject matter. Rather than focus solely on the proposed topic, as we had it on the invitation and BBC official website (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-27885700), the precarious incidence caused some digression, making us to almost lose focus on what the debate was all about.  

At the audience, we were waiting for the political leadership to tell us how we are ready to lead Africa. They did not disappoint us. The Minister of Interior, Abba Morro, said that Nigeria is ready to lead Africa because it has the highest population in Africa. Dr. Kalu Idika Kalu argued that it is not a new thing that Nigeria has the potential to lead Africa, however, since 1960; Nigeria has constantly remained a potential state that is yet to be translated into concrete reality of development. Nigeria can lead Africa but the indicators are not there, he further elaborated. We  hoped  that governors at the audience; Rotimi Amaechi and Babangida Aliyu, would provide meaningful direction, but their insight on how we can lead Africa was not different from Abba Moro’s. None of them showed the capacity to lead the process. 

Is Nigeria ready to lead Africa?

It is important to begin this debate by interrogating our actual growth and development rather than be emotional about our rebased Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and where we will be in 2020 or 2030. What does it mean to be a leading African economy? Will ascribing Africa’s biggest economy to ourselves solve the problems of poverty and inequality in Nigeria? Indeed, the neo-liberal  models  that  are generating growth and driving us closer  to  a  middle  income category  have  also  generated poverty and inequality. It is important to note that the market fundamentalists are enthusiastic to underscore that 6 out of the 10 countries globally that have recorded the fastest economic growth are in Africa. However, they are silent on the fact that those 6 countries are also witnessing escalating inequality and severe poverty. For instance, despite our rebased Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the much celebrated economic growth, our poverty still stands at 69%. 

Is the growth that comes with gross inequality and exclusion desirable, or sustainable? Unquestionably not! Then comes another question, are the socioeconomic disparities perpetrated by the neo-liberal model a necessary price we have to pay in our ignorance of measuring how well our economy is doing? The neo-liberal model fundamentalists who sing the praise of our rebased GDP are yet to sincerely answer the question what is happening to poverty, inequality and unemployment?  Certainly they will not because the economists live in a denial and seem not to understand our current realities.
 
We should interrogate our potential to solving our local problems first before thinking of leading the entire continent. To realise development, we must be a developmental state that acts proactively to transform the economy and the state. We have to do this within the democratic setting in which we operate. Our politics at the moment is confrontational. Our politics must give consensus to development priorities that could transform our economies and the state.  Our ability to direct our affairs, build strong institutions, create a space for civil society organizations and build the capacity of our citizens to engage governance will be determinant factors for measuring our readiness for development and eventually lead Africa. 
 
Nigeria’s  potential cannot be translated into development unless huge investments are made on education and health, promotion of inclusive growth, creation of employment and address matters to do with the sustainability of our development process. The issue, therefore, is not economists rebasing our GDP growth but what  the policies and development models are being put in place to drive development and turn our 170 million people  into assets. 

One way we can begin to redefine our path as a nation is to have industrialization as an integral part of our development planning process. Without industrialization, we are not going to build an economy that will create opportunities and end poverty. Apparently, all countries that have reduced poverty did so because the economies grew out of practical strategies that created sustainable jobs and provided decent incomes based on industrial growth. Our model which bases on the intensification of our past colonial way of commodity export is not sustainable for our growth and development. 

We must remodel our political process. Our political parties are not engaging the population; they are essentially “periodic vote gathering organizations.” We do not have any democratic structures within which we have debates on the problems facing us and about the choices that needed to be made. Our political parties are not people driven, their ability to understand what is happening in our society is weak. The factions in our political parties are about patronage - not about the needs of the people.  

Why has our country defiled all the development frameworks and models? Why have all the benchmarks we set for ourselves not been achieved? We need a sincere democratic debate with the state actors, non-state actors, religious leaders, business giants and citizens on what needs to be done. We need to have a comprehensive review of what has happened during the last 60 years and come up with a new ways of crafting the development model we need to adopt and determine what future we need for our people. 

Our current realities do not allow us to lead Africa. On whether we have the ability to lead Africa, our bureaucrats, academics and government paid agents promptly make reference to our population, GDP growth and our recent rebased GDP to enlarge their illusion of our greatness which they have propagated and promoted without any result to show. Our lack of firm socio-economic substructure, a functional industrial foundation, and a stable self-regulatory policy further exposes the illusion and lack of understanding  of our bureaucrats, academia, ruling class in their calculation of our situation. It is embarrassing that we are still following the neo-liberal models in analyzing our economic growth and we are yet to reappraise, rethink and restructure our own model of measuring our economic growth.
 
Apparently, illusions are not easily surrendered, and when they are surrendered, they are often succeeded by new myths. It will be difficult for the economists and our government propagandists to agree with our present reality. I am particularly worried. Judging from our poverty rate, youth bulge and unemployment, insecurity, mega corruption, import dependent economy, poor education, inadequate housing and leadership failure, we still impose to ourselves the readiness to lead Africa. We might be rich, big, large, and wealthy or even a populous country, but we do not at the moment have the capacity to lead Africa. 

We need to rethink our past, re-examine our democracy, ask where we went wrong, and what to do in future to have a better Nigeria. We must have an alternative crop of elite with alternative perspectives. If we fail to dream new dreams and see new visions for the future, we are getting nowhere. To lead Africa, we must build a formidable military might, industrial base, a sound economic structure, a conscientized civil society, and stable political system. Our false generosity abroad and poverty at home must be stopped. 

It is not a taboo for us to aspire to lead Africa, but we must understand that there is a lot work to be done before that happens. We must think of how to achieve it and plan towards it. The aspiration alone is not enough, what matters most is how to get there. In our ‘camouflage’ arguments, yes, we hosted the World Economic Forum (WEF) and rebased our GDP this year 2014 and the economy is growing at 7% rate. Beyond rebasing our GDP, what the economists do not know is that Rwanda and Mauritius did not wait for neo-liberal model analysis in addressing their challenges. Kwame Nkrumah, Thomas Sankara and Amilcar Cabral have proven the economists wrong; they have shown you can only improve the lives of the citizens via purposeful leadership which is a key missing link in our country that aspires to lead Africa.

Without a visionary leadership and citizens with capacity to engage governance, no matter how we rebase our GDP we will continue our aspirant to lead Africa. Economists must understand the neo-liberal models have not been solution to ensuring development anywhere in the world. It is a mere intellectual delusion, and those who still argue on the basis of neo-liberal models must be stoned. 

By Audu Liberty Oseni
Centre for Democracy and Development
[email protected]


This article has been read 2,357 times
COMMENTS